
Talarico's Closing Pitch to Texas: You Are My Slingshot
Democrat James Talarico brought his "Clear Eyes, Full Hearts" tour to Dallas on Thursday evening, October 29, in the last weekend push before the November 3 general election. The Dallas stop capped a hopscotch week across El Paso, Midland and Amarillo, plus a larger-than-expected crowd in deep-red Lubbock, where his campaign said more than 4,000 people signed up, and a planned October 30 stop in College Station.
The closing message was biblical. "David wasn't as big or as strong as Goliath. He didn't have as many weapons, but he had hope. He had faith and he had a slingshot," Talarico told the Dallas crowd. "Dallas, you are my slingshot. The people of Texas are my slingshot." He had used the same line days earlier with Latino supporters in Brownsville. He closed by casting the finish as football: "This is the last play of the last drive. We leave it all on the field. We are the underdogs. It's David versus Goliath. It's the powers that be versus the powers that ought to be. And it's time to start flipping over some tables."
Talarico's official pitch is affordability: costs that have climbed relentlessly for years, which he blames on billionaires and corrupt politicians rigging the system. In Dallas he tied that frame to health care costs, tariffs, gasoline prices and the impact of data centers on communities. The slogan doing the most work is "Texas is not for sale," aimed at the outside money flooding in for his rival, above all the spending bankrolled by Elon Musk.
Republican Ken Paxton, the state attorney general backed by Donald Trump, is answering with an 18-day bus tour under the "Come and Take It" banner, aimed at conservative voters. Paxton vanquished incumbent GOP Senator John Cornyn in a divisive primary. A Talarico win would make him the first Democrat to win a United States Senate race in Texas since 1988.
Every late poll describes the same race. A Fox News poll released October 21 had Talarico and Paxton tied at 49 percent each, down from a 51 to 49 Talarico edge in the prior Fox survey. An Emerson College survey put Talarico ahead 48 to 46. A Texas Southern University poll of 2,000 likely voters, conducted October 21 to 25, also gave Talarico a two-point lead with a 2.19-point margin of error, a statistical tie. The RealClearPolitics average of October 6 to 19 polls had Talarico up 1.8 points. The Cook Political Report moved the seat to toss-up in August, and Decision Desk HQ gives Talarico a 54 percent chance of flipping it.
The money is historic. Talarico raised 64 million dollars from July through September, more than any Senate candidate ever in a third quarter, breaking the 57 million record set by Jaime Harrison in 2020. Paxton raised 18 million over the same quarter. Since launch, Talarico's principal committee has raised more than 146 million, over 158 million with his Victory Fund, spending about 145 million with just over 12 million in cash left. His campaign says more than 1.3 million people donated and 97 percent of contributions were 100 dollars or less. Republican outside groups have spent more than 158 million against him, over 200 million overall with nearly all of it bankrolled by Musk, including more than 175 million since September 1, and total political advertising in the race has passed 500 million.
Early voting began October 19 and ends October 30, with Election Day on November 3. Voters naming the economy as their top issue tilt narrowly to Paxton, while younger voters and packed rally rooms power Talarico's side. His bet is that crowds plus a small polling lead convert into a turnout wave; the rival bet is that the red wall holds one more time.
Republicans are scrambling to defend a Texas seat that once looked safe. A Talarico victory cracks a decades-long grip on the state. A loss leaves Democrats still hunting for a path to turn Texas blue. Either way, the next three days decide it at the ballot box.
When a candidate frames himself as David against Goliath, does that make you more likely to vote, or does it sound like theater? When did rising costs last force a hard choice in your own life, and should that shape an election?